|
Programs
@School
of Philosophy
@
Theories of Knowledge
@Research
guides
@Philosophy
with Practice
@Philosophical
Counseling
@Yoga
and Meditation
Why Indian Philosophy, Why not Nepalese
Philosophy?
Most Indian
historians have shown bois ideology toward Indian-subcontinent.
Political India couldn't claim to be whole ancient rational properties as
"Indian history, Indian Philosophy, Indian Religion, Indian Cultures
etc,.) because these are common properties of several nations like
Nepal, Pakistan, Bhutan, B'desh and other. Indeed, British and after
British Indian creations within it are "Indian" but Vedic, Upanishadic and
other ancient traditions are common. For Nepalese, The
Buddhist-Philosophy is ONLY Nepalese philosophy by history. Indian
couldn't claim it to be under banner of "Indian Philosophy"
respectively. Swami Vivekananda, S. Radha krisnnan, Aarvindo, Krishna
murthy like philosopher and philosophies are Indian because they done it
within political India.
Rather saying
Indian Philosophy saying Aryan Philosophy is more rational for ancient
Indian properties.
According to Upaishads: Philosophy is a wisdom which
helps human to achieve goal of salvation or oneness with whole.
What is salvation ?
Ancient to Modern Philosopher (India, Nepal) always trying to get supreme
goal of salvation/Nirvana/oneness with Brahman but no-one is told to
be perfect. What really is : above goal? Is it possible to get
Oneness with Brahman etc or these just are Human Idea to deal
him/herself as immortal?
Nepali Philosophy
|
